Skip to content

Report from Honolulu, Part Two: Continuing questions about “Who is Barack Obama?”

May 20, 2009

Internet Powerhouse Andy Martin continues his reporting with a discussion of the upcoming movie “Obama: The Hawai’i Years,” and the film’s impact on public perceptions about Obama’s family history. Martin is the originator of the theory that Frank Marshall Davis is Barack Obama’s biological father. “Years” was researched and filmed in Hawai’i.

“Obama: The Hawai’i Years” and
Operation Aloha Obama II are
historical research projects of
Andy Martin
Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”



(NEW YORK)(May 20, 2009)

Dear Friends:


This my second of two reports on our recently concluded investigative trip to Honolulu. Thanks to all of you, the effort was a major success. As the only Obama investigator/critic who has made multiple trips to Hawai’i I can assure you there is no substitute for on-the-scene experience.

Today I report on the way your support for our activity in Hawai’i is changing the perception of Barack Obama’s family history.

When we conducted “Operation Aloha Obama” in October 2008 the investigative team in Honolulu was the first to look into Barack Obama’s family history. The mainstream media had ignored Obama’s Hawai’i years and pretended that Obama was “from Chicago.” Obama arrived in Chicago as an adult in his mid-20’s. Almost any psychologist will attest that character and identity are formed in childhood years, not in adulthood.

We asked the basic question: who is Barack Obama? There had even been differencing explanations as to where Obama was born. Two hospitals had been identified as his birthplace. How could something as simple as a birth hospital become occluded?

Likewise, way back in 2004 I was the first to raise questions about Obama’s family history. It took the mainstream media four years to catch up with me and admit the obvious: “Dreams From My Father” was a novel, not an autobiography. Obama had invented composite characters. No white author could get away with such legerdemain. The mainstream media have never admitted that Obama was raised as a Muslim until the age of ten.

And then there was the question of “Frank.” By Barack’s own admission, “Frank” had obviously been a critical influence in Obama’s formative years. Frank was, of course, Frank Marshall Davis, poet, author, writer, civil rights agitator, and communist.

Based on research we conducted in October, 2008 I announced that it was my belief that Frank Marshall Davis was actually Barack Obamas biological father. Barack Obama, the Kenyan student, had been a stand-in for Davis because Davis was already married to a wealthy woman and had a family.

How was this possible? Families lie about themselves all the time.

CNN made light of the theory, but my analysis has received growing acceptance despite mainstream media censorship.

When we returned to Honolulu in “Operation Aloha Obama II” to film “Obama: The Hawai’i Years,” we tested the Frank Marshall Davis hypothesis all over again.

When you plug the Kenyan Obama’s name in as “father” in Barack Obama’s family tree, nothing makes sense, and nothing adds up. When you substitute Frank Marshall Davis’ name, all the pieces of the puzzle fit neatly together. The “dreams” in “Dreams From My Father” were Frank Marshall Davis’ dreams. Barack Obama came to Chicago because Chicago was both the residence and spiritual home that Frank had been forced to abandon.

Obama used his control of the New York Times to smear me and intimidate Fox News last year. I am under constant electronic attack by Obamabots. Why are they still so afraid of me? The campaign was over months ago.

But while the campaign is over, the search for the historical truth and our efforts to find the facts about Barack Obama are continuing.

There have been differences of opinion as to how to pursue facts about Obama. After the election there was a flurry of lawsuits challenging Obama’s “eligibility.” The lawsuits lacked legal or procedural substance. They were too late, often filed in the wrong courts, and presupposed facts that had not been proven or legal principles that did not exist. These lawsuits made Obama’s opponents feel good, but they achieved no useful purpose.

On the other hand, I filed suit in Hawai’i, to pry loose Obama’s original, typewritten 1961 birth certificate. That is the only starting place to learn the truth about Obama. Obama has prevented disclosure of this document despite its obvious practical importance and historical significance.

Unlike the “hares” that were quick to file lawsuits without evidence, I adopted the role of a tortoise who sought evidence before making accusations. I refused to make arguments that I knew would not stand up in court. There is a vast difference between making a frivolous or fictitious claim that is not supported by facts, and making an arguable claim that seeks to find the facts. I have always focused on finding the facts and telling the truth.

In the process, we have accomplished something that has changed the way researchers and authors will approach Obama’s ancestry and parentage in the future. They will have to address the Frank Marshall Davis theory. We have both highlighted the circumstantial evidence connecting Davis to Obama and focused on Davis as the missing link in explaining Obama’s character as a committed radical.

There is nothing wrong with continuing to pry into the unknown truths about Obama’s past. Scholars are still arguing about who William Shakespeare really was four hundred years ago. We will ultimately obtain an answer through DNA and possibly Obama’s own admission when he feels free enough to admit the truth about himself.

So, when we screen “Obama: the Hawai’i Years,” we will be presenting both known facts about Obama, for the first time anywhere in a coherent movie format, as well as raising scholarly questions about Obama’s true parentage.

Your support and your encouragement are changing the face and pace of historical research about Barack Obama. In the past, Obama has used media sycophants such as David Mendell of the Chicago Tribune to deliver his disinformation. We won’t let him get away with that tactic even though he will no doubt seek to manipulate David Maraniss’ proposed biography.

I don’t know how soon we will be able to edit the tape, and possibly do some in-fill video, but as soon as we can afford to complete the movie we will release it on the Internet.

God bless you all. We are doing a good job; we need your support. If you have not yet backed Operation Aloha Obama II or “Obama: The Hawai’i Years,” you can make an online donation at:

or mail a check to us at P.O. Box 1851, New York, NY 10150-1851.

Best wishes,


Readers of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, say the book is still the only gold standard and practical handbook on Barack Obama’s unfitness for the presidency. Buy it.
Book orders: or Immediate shipment from or signed copies (delayed for signing) from the publisher are available.
URGENT APPEAL: The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama raises money to oppose President Barack Obama’s radical agenda and also to support
Please give generously. Our ability to fight and defeat Barack Obama’s political agenda is directly dependent on the generosity of every American.
“The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama has no bundlers, no fat cats and no illegal contributions. Obama is opposed to almost everything America stands for,” says Executive Director Andy Martin. “But while Obama has raised a billion dollar slush fund, his opponents lack sufficient resources. Americans can either contribute now, or pay later. If we do not succeed, Obama will.”
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He is currently promoting his best-selling book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask and producing the new Internet movie “Obama: The Hawai’i years.” Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of

Martin comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York. He is an announced candidate for Barack Obama’s former U. S. Senate seat.


His columns are also posted at;
[NOTE: We frequently correct typographical errors and additions/subtractions on our blogs, where you can find the latest edition of this release.]

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329 (cell not always on)
© Copyright by Andy Martin 2009.


From → Uncategorized

  1. rrobin permalink

    I did not see an update of your request for the Obama documents that would show that he is a ‘natural born citizen’ and therefore eligible for the presidency.
    Do you have any news on that issue, please.
    Thank you

  2. LegalEagle permalink

    So what documents were produced by Hawaii officials on this trip??

  3. Dennis permalink


    1. So if Frank Marshall Davis was actually BHO-2’s biological father, that would prove that he is a “Natural Born” citizen regardless of BHO’s place of birth, because Frank was a US citizen?

    2. Or only if BHO-2 was born in Hawaii?

    3. On the other hand if BHO-2’s father was BHO-1 he can not be Natural Born (according the Donofrio theory) regardless of the birthplace, because BHO-1 was a British citizen and his mother was too young to confer US citizenship?

    4. So if the father was BHO-1, and BHO-2 was born in Hawaii than BHO-2 is an ordinary, but not natural born US citizen?

    • We discuss these issues in our upcoming video presentation from the Birth Certificate Conference in Washington, DC April 3-4. But yes, if I am correct that Frank is the father, there is no citizenship issue.

  4. Dennis permalink

    Attn.: Andy
    Thanks for the answer. So if Frank is the father there is no eligibility problem. But would it not be a misrepresentation problem? Or BHO-2 could claim that he did not know that Frank is his father?

    Maybe the GOP knew that Frank is the father that is why they did not raise the eligibility issue at the Electoral Vote Confirmation in January. Just speculation, I admit. That still does not explain their inaction, because the unfolding scandal would still hurt the Democrat Party.

    I can not figure out, why the GOP did not object at that time. It was a nothing-to-loose and a lot-to-win situation. Cheney never even asked the constitutionally required question (if anyone wishes to object.) I have never heard a plausible explanation for that. To me it is a total mystery. I am sure you are better informed than I. Do you have a guess what was in the GOP leader’s mind?

    Looking forward to see the video.

    • McCain had a cockeyed campaign strategy for dealing with Obama. As for the “misrepresentation,” Obama was a baby when this took place.

      • Dennis permalink

        Attn.: Andy
        Cockeyed is too kind a word for McCain’s campaign strategy. In my humble opinion, it was ineffective, self destructive, illogical, lacking common sense, not coming to the aid of chosen running mate, just using publishable words.
        But the question pertains to the January Elector’s Vote Confirmation hearing by the joint session of Congress. The campaign was over. The GOP, by objecting to the eligibility, could have easily force the Supreme Court to rule on merit that you and others were denied by the various state courts. Any information that would have come out would have hurt the Democrat Party. So the GOP could have only gained, risking nothing, as McCain was gone already. Furthermore, it would have cost nothing as far as legal fees.
        What was especially surprising that Cheney did not even ask the constitutionally required question (if anyone desires to object). I believe some attorney is already naming Cheney as defendant in a lawsuit for that violation of the Constitution.
        What was in the GOP leaders’ and supporters’ mind? McCain was no longer a leader. But people like Steele, Bush, Cheney, Rush, Hennedy and others? There was total silence. Rush single-handedly could have whip up enough pressure for the objection to be raised, even if everyone else resisted.
        This is a total mystery to many of us. Please help us to understand it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: